Ortega

Williams v. Ortega

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20203:18-cv-00547California1,003 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 18cv547-LAB-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO COMPEL AND

MOTION FOR

O. ORTEGA, et al.,

RECONSIDERATION

Defendants. [ECF No. 85] 16 On October 7, 2020, Plaintiff Lance Williams (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a motion to compel Defendants O. Ortega, R. Valencia, S. Bustos, F. Lewis, A. Bowman, and M. Kimani (collectively, “Defendants”) to supplement their response to his request for production of documents, set two, number two. (ECF No. 85 at 1). Plaintiff also asks the Court to reconsider its September 17, 2020 Order denying Plaintiff’s motion to compel his request for production of documents, set four and denying his request that the Court issue a subpoena on his behalf. (Id. at 2-3). Defendants filed a response in opposition on October 15, 2020. (ECF No. 87). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.