Moore
Moore v. Lankford
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 19CV2406-DMS (BLM) ROBERT MOORE,
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER
v. COMPELLING DISCOVERY
JOE LANKFORD, MERCEDES ARELLANO, R. [ECF No. 27]
BUCKEL, AND DAVID STROMSKI,
15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s September 4, 2020 Motion for Order Compelling Discovery [ECF No. 27 (“MTC”)], Defendants’ September 22, 2020 Opposition to the motion [ECF No. 30 (“Oppo.”)], and Plaintiff’s September 29, 2020 reply [ECF No. 31 (“Reply”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED IN PART. DISCOVERY BACKGROUND On July 10, 2020, Plaintiff served written discovery on Defendants that included Requests for Production of Documents (“RFPs”) and Interrogatories. MTC at 18-48 and 49-51 (“Plaintiff’s Decl.”) at ¶ 2; see also Oppo. at 6; ECF No. 30-1, Declaration of Christopher H. Findley In Support of Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s…