M.

M. v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20203:19-cv-01108California4,369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A.M., Case No.: 19-CV-1108 TWR (AGS) Plaintiff, ORDER (1) GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS, AND (2) DISMISSING

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

16 (ECF No. 12)

Presently before the Court is Defendant the United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Mot.,” ECF No. 12), as well as Plaintiff A.M.’s Partial Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 16) and Defendant’s Reply in Support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 18) the Motion. After the Honorable Anthony J. Battaglia took this matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7(d)(1), (see ECF No. 19), this action was transferred to the undersigned. (See ECF No. 20.) Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” ECF No. 9), the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.