Kamfiroozie
Kamfiroozie v. Federal Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAJID KAMFIROOZIE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-1267-BAS-AHG
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
v. MOTION TO REMAND (ECF No. 3)
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et
al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiffs Majid Kamfiroozie and Caroline Kamfiroozie own a multi-million house in San Diego County, which is insured by Defendant Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”), an Indiana Corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey. In 2019, the Kamfiroozies’s house suffered water damage. The Kamfiroozies filed an insurance claim with Federal and requested for an allowance to pay for substitute housing. Federal and their agents, Joseph McNeil and Courtney Fenstra, allegedly mishandled the claim by failing to timely respond to the Kamfiroozies, assessing the repair cost at an unreasonably low amount, and imposing unreasonable conditions on the substitute housing allowance, among others. The Kamfiroozies sued Federal,…