MG

MG v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20203:19-cv-01252California4,422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 M.G., Case No.: 19-cv-1252-TWR-AHG Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. (Doc. No. 13)

United States of America (“Defendant” or “United States”) moves to dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff M.G.’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See Doc. No. 13.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (See Doc. No. 18.) Defendant filed a reply in support of the motion. (See Doc. No. 19.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.d.1, the Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s cause of action for negligence to the extent it …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.