M.

M. v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20203:19-cv-01108California4,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A.M., Case No.: 19-CV-1108 TWR (AGS) Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. (ECF Nos. 12)

Presently before the Court is Defendant the United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (“Mot.,” ECF No. 12), as well as Plaintiff A.M.’s Partial Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 16) and Defendant’s Reply in Support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 18) the Motion. After the Honorable Anthony J. Battaglia took this matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7(d)(1), (see ECF No. 19), this action was transferred to the undersigned. (See ECF No. 20.) Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” ECF No. 9), the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion and DISMISSES WITHOUT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.