Thomas

Thomas v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20203:18-cv-01835California745 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERT THOMAS, Case No.: 18-cv-01835-GPC (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE

v. MOTION TO MODIFY

SCHEDULING ORDER

W.L. MONTGOMERY, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 40] 16 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ ex parte motion to modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 40.) Defendants request a 45-day continuance of the Mandatory Settlement Conference currently scheduled for October 28, 2020. (Id. at 1.) Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the scheduling order (ECF No. 30) is modified as follows: A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on December 16, 2020, at 9:00 AM, before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt in Room 5180 of the Edward J. Schwartz U.S. Courthouse, 221 West Broadway, San Diego, California 92101. Defendants and defense counsel shall personally attend the settlement conference. Plaintiff shall appear by video conference. Counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.