McGraw

McGraw v. Pacifica Ashwood LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20203:20-cv-00954California5,148 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDALL SCOTT MCGRAW, Case No. 20-cv-954-MMA (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

PACIFICA ASHWOOD LLC’S

PACIFICA ASHWOOD LLC, et al.,

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants. [Doc. No. 23] 16 17 18 In his Complaint, Randall Scott McGraw (“Plaintiff”) alleges four causes of action: (1) violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681–1681x; (2) violation of the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCCRA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1785.1–1785.6; (3) Financial Abuse of Dependent Adult, Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 15657.5; and (4) violation of California’s unlawful eviction and retaliation laws, Cal. Civ. Code § 1940–1942.5. See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendant Pacifica Ashwood LLC (“Pacifica”) moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 27 28 12(b)(6) on res judicata grounds. See Doc. No. 23. Plaintiff filed an opposition to 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.