Anderson
Anderson v. Becerra
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 KARINA ANDERSON, an individual; Case No.: 20-cv-00315-AJB-JLB LERAJJAREAN RA-O-KEL-LY, an 10 individual, ORDER: 11 Plaintiffs, (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 12 v. MOTION TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT; GAVIN NEWSON, Governor of the State
of California, et al., (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX Defendants. PARTE MOTION FOR
TEMPRORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER AS MOOT; AND
17 (3) DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT
WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
19 (Doc. Nos. 10, 11, 13)
The Court reviews pro se Plaintiffs, Karina Anderson and Lerajjarean Ra-O-Kel-Ly’s (“Plaintiffs”) first amended complaint (“FAC”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when plaintiffs file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. Nos. 10, 11.) Pursuant to this mandatory screening, the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ FAC does not sufficiently state a claim for relief. Thus, the Court DENIES as moot Plaintiffs’ IFP motions, (Doc. Nos.…