Anderson

Anderson v. Becerra

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20203:20-cv-00315California2,509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 KARINA ANDERSON, an individual; Case No.: 20-cv-00315-AJB-JLB LERAJJAREAN RA-O-KEL-LY, an 10 individual, ORDER: 11 Plaintiffs, (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 12 v. MOTION TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT; GAVIN NEWSON, Governor of the State

of California, et al., (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX Defendants. PARTE MOTION FOR

TEMPRORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER AS MOOT; AND

17 (3) DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

19 (Doc. Nos. 10, 11, 13)

The Court reviews pro se Plaintiffs, Karina Anderson and Lerajjarean Ra-O-Kel-Ly’s (“Plaintiffs”) first amended complaint (“FAC”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when plaintiffs file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. Nos. 10, 11.) Pursuant to this mandatory screening, the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ FAC does not sufficiently state a claim for relief. Thus, the Court DENIES as moot Plaintiffs’ IFP motions, (Doc. Nos.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.