Luckett

Luckett v. Sudbury

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20203:20-cv-00932California972 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || KEITH RUSSEL LUCKETT, Case No. 20cv932-MMA-JLB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S vs. MOTION TO VACATE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) 15 || A. SUDBURY, et al., Defendants.| [Doc. No. 13] 17 Procedural History On May 18, 2020, Plaintiff Keith Russel Luckett, an inmate currently incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § ||1983. See Doc. No. 1. Upon initial screening, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint 22 || for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b)(1). See 23 || Doc. No. 3. Specifically, the Court noted that Plaintiff's claims were untimely and 24 || explained that Plaintiff had failed to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate equitable 25 || tolling of the statutory limitations period. See id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.