Razi

Razi v. Pompeo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20203:20-cv-00982California6,331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 FARZANEH RAZI, individually and as Case No.: 20–CV–0982–W–MSB Gaurdian ad Litem for S.J., a minor;

MOHAMMADALI JENABZADEH; ORDER:

ELIAS YAZDANSHENAS;

SAHARNAZ MONTAZERI; NEGAR (1) GRANTING IN PART AND

11 SADEGHOLVAD, individually and as DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ Gaurdian ad Litem for B.S.; KOUROSH MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 8] SEPAHPOUR; ALI VATAN and

MOHAMMAD SALEH VATAN,

14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 MICHAEL R. POMPEO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; and DOES 18 #1–#10 who are non–consular officer officials employed by the Department of State, or its contractors such as Quality 20 Support, Inc., 21 Defendants. 22 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss [Doc. 8].) The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.