Razi
Razi v. Pompeo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 FARZANEH RAZI, individually and as Case No.: 20–CV–0982–W–MSB Gaurdian ad Litem for S.J., a minor;
MOHAMMADALI JENABZADEH; ORDER:
ELIAS YAZDANSHENAS;
SAHARNAZ MONTAZERI; NEGAR (1) GRANTING IN PART AND
11 SADEGHOLVAD, individually and as DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ Gaurdian ad Litem for B.S.; KOUROSH MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 8] SEPAHPOUR; ALI VATAN and
MOHAMMAD SALEH VATAN,
14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 MICHAEL R. POMPEO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; and DOES 18 #1–#10 who are non–consular officer officials employed by the Department of State, or its contractors such as Quality 20 Support, Inc., 21 Defendants. 22 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss [Doc. 8].) The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated 27 …