Riley

Riley v. Vizcarra

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20203:18-cv-02911California4,729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON RILEY, Case No.: 3:18-cv-2911-JAH-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND VIZCARRA, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC

Defendant. CONFERENCE, and 16 (2) SETTING TELEPHONIC

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

18 [ECF No. 53]

20 Before the Court is Plaintiff Shannon Riley’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Telephonic Conference. ECF No. 53. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil complaint pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983 relating to incidents that occurred while incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego, California. ECF No. 24. In the instant motion, Plaintiff requests (1) a telephonic status conference regarding discovery and (2) the opportunity for settlement negotiations. ECF No. 53 at 1–2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.