Amend

Amend v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20203:20-cv-01566California929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETE AMEND, Case No.: 20cv1566-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

ANDREW SAUL,

Defendant. [ECF No. 8]

17 The instant matter was initiated on August 13, 2020, when Plaintiff filed a Complaint 18 “for judicial review of the Commissioner’s final administrative decision[.]” ECF No. 1. 19 Plaintiff concurrently filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. at 20 2. On September 17, 2020, the Court issued an Order Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff’s 21 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint with 22 Leave to Amend. ECF No. 5. 23 On October 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. ECF No. 7. On October 24 20, 2020, Plaintiff re-filed his Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No.8. 25 Having reviewed the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s 26 Motion for Leave to Proceed …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.