Harner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL HARNER, Case No.: 18-CV-1993 W (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY

JUDGMENT OR, IN THE

COMPANY,

ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL Defendant. SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 14] 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant USAA General Indemnity Co’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment. Plaintiff Paul Harner opposes. The Court decides the motion on the papers submitted, and without oral argument. See Civ.L.R. 7.1.d.1. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion [Doc. 14]. 24 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Paul Harner is suing his insurer, Defendant USAA General Indemnity Company, for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair 28 dealing (i.e., “bad faith”), and intentional…