Wolf

Smith v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20203:20-cv-01409California3,472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 G. SMITH, Case No.: 20cv1409 JAH (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1. GRANTING MOTION TO DANIEL WOLF and PAUL

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BEDINGTON,

[Doc. No. 2]; Defendant. 14 2. DISMISSING IN PART COMPLAINT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO

16 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) [Doc. No. 1] 17 INTRODUCTION On July 22, 2020, G. Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint seeking damages against Daniel Wolf and Paul Bedington (“Defendants”) for seven California state law claims: breach of contract, assault, trespass, trespass to chattels, conversion, abuse of process, and unjust enrichment. After a careful review of the pleadings, exhibits and motions and for the reasons set forth below, the Court (1) GRANTS the motion for leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis, [Doc. No. 2]; (2) DISMISSES in part the Complaint, [Doc. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.