Huerta

Huerta v. Nielsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20203:18-cv-01640California876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HUERTA, Case No. 18cv1640-MMA (LL)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO RETAX COSTS

CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of [Doc. No. 60] Homeland Security, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff David Huerta is a Seized Property Specialist with United States Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), Department of Homeland Security. He filed this action pro se pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, which protects federal employees from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Plaintiff alleged that his supervisor racially discriminated and retaliated against him. See Doc. No. 20. The government moved for summary judgment as to all claims. See Doc. No. 33. The Court granted the motion and entered judgment in the government’s favor. See Doc. Nos. 50, 51. Thereafter, the government submitted a bill of costs seeking reimbursement for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.