McCloud

McCloud v. Bird-Hunt

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20203:19-cv-00618California804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIE MCCLOUD, Case No.: 19-cv-00618-TWR-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

T. BYRD-HUNT, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 30] 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff Willie McCloud’s motion for miscellaneous relief, in which he requests to amend the Scheduling Order, to obtain a copy of the Complaint, and “the list of court approved appointed experts.” (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se an in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 48 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for a copy of his Complaint. Ordinarily, a plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status or incarceration does not entitle him to free copies of court documents. The statute providing authority to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, does not include…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.