Goolsby

Goolsby v. San Diego, County of

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20203:17-cv-00564California4,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS GOOLSBY, Case No.: 3:17-cv-00564-WQH-NLS

ORDER

Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

16 Defendants. 17 HAYES, Judge: 18 The matter before the Court is the Motion for Re-taxation of Costs filed by Plaintiff 19 Thomas Goolsby. (ECF No. 183).

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

21 On March 21, 2017, Plaintiff Thomas Goolsby, a state inmate proceeding pro se, 22 commenced this action by filing a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 23 against 11 named Defendants. (ECF No. 1). On the same day, Plaintiff filed a Motion for 24 Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2). On June 27, 2017, the Court 25 granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP; dismissed some of the causes of action 26 in Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 27 § 1915A(b); and granted Plaintiff 45 days leave to either notify the Court of his intention 28 to proceed with only his Eighth Amendment claims or file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 4). On August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.