William

Smith v. William

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20203:20-cv-01983California949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENYAMIN SMITH, Case No.: 3:20-CV-01983-TWR-MDD Booking # 209-301-98,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY

FILING FEE REQUIRED

BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR KROUT WILLIAM, et al.,

FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED

Defendants. IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

19 20 Plaintiff Benyamin Smith (“Plaintiff”), a pretrial detainee at the San Diego Central Jail, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF No. 1, Compl.) I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) Status All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of /// /// $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.