Vashisht-Rota

Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20203:20-cv-00321California1,973 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an Case No.: 20-CV-321 TWR (KSC) individual,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S LEAVE TO FILE v. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, 14 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES,

MOTION TO STAY, (3) DENYING a Utah limited liability company; CHRIS

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

HOWELL, an individual; and JUSTIN

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SPENCER, an individual, SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (4) Defendants. DENYING AS MOOT

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS

20 (ECF Nos. 21, 80, 93, 94)

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Aparna Vashisht-Rota’s Motions for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint (“Mot. to Amend,” ECF No. 80), to Stay (“Mot. to Stay,” ECF No. 93), and for Summary Judgment (“MSJ,” ECF No. 94) and Defendants Howell Management Services and Chris Howell’s Motion to Dismiss (“Mot. to Dismiss,” 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.