Grady

Grady v. Wyatt

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20203:20-cv-01631California3,862 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MITCHELL QUINTIN GRADY, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01631-AJB-BGS

CDCR #AS-8775,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(ECF No. 2);

K. WYATT, J. COVARRUBIAS,

Defendants. AND 17 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 28 U.S.C. § 20 1915A(b) 21 Plaintiff Mitchell Quintin Grady, currently incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“Centinela”) in Imperial, California, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff alleges that two officials at Centinela violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights in connection with his requests for medical care and in the administrative grievance process. Plaintiff did not prepay the $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) at the time of filing and has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.