Navarro

Williams v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20203:18-cv-01318-DMS-BGSCalifornia11,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 18cv1318-DMS (RBM)

CDCR #AG-2344,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT

O. NAVARRO, N. A. GARSILASO, TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); and

E. ESTRADA, C. BAGNOL,

F. LEWIS, L. HALL, DR. R. KATYAL, (2) DISMISSING COUNT TWO AND

DR. S. KRITTMAN, C. TISCORNIA, PORTIONS OF COUNTS ONE AND

THREE OF THE FIRST AMENDED CONNIE, McGUIRRE, DR. D. LAFLER,

COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

A. SOTO, T. BYRD-HUNT, A. RUELES,

M. RODRIGUEZ and J. MEJIA,

19 Defendants. 20 21 Lance Williams (“Plaintiff”) is a California prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 61.) Plaintiff claims that while housed at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, his: (1) Eighth Amendment rights were violated when he was not released…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.