Musgjerd

Savills Inc. v. Musgjerd

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20203:20-cv-00904California2,270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAVILLS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-904-MMA (BLM)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT

Petitioner, MUSGJERD’S MOTION FOR v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES 13 CHRISTOPHER MUSGJERD, and [Doc. No. 30] ROBERT MCGRIFF, 15 Respondents. 16 Savills, Inc. (“Petitioner”) initiated this action by filing a Petition for an order compelling arbitration and enjoining Respondents Christopher Musgjerd (“Musgjerd”) and Robert McGriff (“McGriff”) “from proceeding in [a] state court action pending in San Diego County Superior Court.” See Doc. No. 1. Musgjerd moved to dismiss the Petition pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). See Doc. No. 20. The Court granted Musgjerd’s motion to dismiss and the Clerk entered judgment accordingly. See Doc. Nos. 28, 29. Musgjerd now moves for an award of attorneys’ fees incurred defending against this action. See Doc. No. 30. Petitioner filed a “Notice of Non- Opposition” to Musgjerd’s motion. See Doc. No. 31. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.