McAleenan

Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20203:17-cv-02366California9,673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AL OTRO LADO, et al., Case No. 17-cv-02366-BAS-KSC 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER: 12 v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of OF THE PRELIMINARY Homeland Security, et al., INJUNCTION (ECF No. 494); Defendants. (2) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SEAL

16 (ECF No. 495); AND (3) DENYING AS MOOT

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE

MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT (ECF No. 509) 20 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Clarification of this Court’s November 19, 2019 Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”). (ECF No. 494.) Defendants oppose, and Plaintiffs reply. (ECF Nos. 508, 516.) After considering the parties’ arguments, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion and CLARIFIES the parameters of the Preliminary Injunction below. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.