Dunsmore

Dunsmore v. Eldridge

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20203:20-cv-01518California1,539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DARRYL DUNSMORE, Case No.: 20-cv-01518-BAS-KSC 9 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 10 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING PETITION LAURA ELDRIDGE, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 Respondents. 13 On August 5, 2020, Petitioner, proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”). (ECF No. 1.) On September 22, 2020, the Court dismissed this case without prejudice because Petitioner failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement. (ECF No. 2.) In the dismissal order, Petitioner was notified that in order to have this case reopened he had to either pay the filing fee or provide adequate proof of his inability to pay, no later than October 30, 2020. (See id. at 1.) On October 5, 2020, Petitioner filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Mot. for Leave to Proceed IFP (“Motion for IFP”), ECF No. 3.) I. MOTION FOR IFP Petitioner’s Motion for IFP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.