Stewart

Stewart v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20203:19-cv-01780California1,543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Lindsey Stewart, Case No.: 19cv1780-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO TAKE LEAVE TO

AMEND UNDER FRCP 15(A)(1)

Chick-Fil-A, et al, [Doc. No. 54] Defendants. 16 On September 17, 2019, Plaintiff Lindsey Stewart (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, 17 filed a complaint against Danny Putnam, Becky Putnam, 3 Little Cows, Inc., dba Chick- 18 Fil-A (“3 Little Cows”), and Chick-Fil-A, Inc (the Franchisor), for employment 19 discrimination. [Doc. No. 1.] On November 6, 2019, Defendants filed motions to 20 dismiss and strike the original complaint. [Doc. Nos. 5 and 7.] On January 17, 2020, this 21 Court issued an order granting the motions to dismiss the original complaint with leave to 22 amend. [Doc. No. 21.] 23 On February 21, 2020, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). [Doc. 24 No. 22.] On March 12, 2020, Defendants Danny Putnam and 3 Little Cows filed a 25 motion to dismiss and strike the FAC. [Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.