Dang
Dang v. Pontier
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DANG d/b/a LAW OFFICE OF Case No.: 19cv1519 GPC(AHG) JOSEPH DANG, an individual`,
ORDER RE PONTIER’S PROPOSED
Plaintiff, AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM v. 14 DAVID PONTIER, an individual; 15 TEOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan, a self-funded group health plan; TEOCO Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; 17 UMR Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Glenn C. Nusbaum, an individual; Paul E. Kim, MD Inc., a California corporation; Kevin 19 Yoo, an individual, 20 Defendants.
22 The Court is in receipt of Pontier’s proposed amended counterclaim. In a prior 23 order, the Court granted Pontier’s motion for leave to file an amended counterclaim to 24 add JP Morgan Chase Bank, Farmers Insurance, Inc. and GEICO Insurance, Inc. (Dkt. 25 No. 126.) On October 29, 2020, Pontier filed a notice to withdraw his request to join 26 27 28 those parties because he had filed a separate action against them. (Dkt. No. 132.) The proposed amended counterclaim provides a detailed factual history of Pontier’s 3 …