Salmen
Salmen v. California Department of Correction Rehabilitation
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20203:20-cv-02088California4,180 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:20-cv-2088-GPC-KSC
JUSTIN SALMEN,
CDCR # BK-5881, ORDER:
13 Plaintiff, 1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 14 v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF
§ 1915(a) (ECF No. 2); CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION; S. ROBERTS;
2) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT
M. GLYNN; DR. J. HODGES; A.
COUNSEL (ECF No. 3); AND KENDALL; DR. CHAU; H. FRANKLIN;
S. ANDERSON; A. SHITTU;
3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT
S. GATES,
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) 20 Defendants. AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
22 23 Justin Salmen (“Plaintiff”), incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff claims that Defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by…