Salmen

Salmen v. California Department of Correction Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20203:20-cv-02088California4,180 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:20-cv-2088-GPC-KSC

JUSTIN SALMEN,

CDCR # BK-5881, ORDER:

13 Plaintiff, 1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 14 v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF

§ 1915(a) (ECF No. 2); CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION; S. ROBERTS;

2) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT

M. GLYNN; DR. J. HODGES; A.

COUNSEL (ECF No. 3); AND KENDALL; DR. CHAU; H. FRANKLIN;

S. ANDERSON; A. SHITTU;

3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

S. GATES,

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) 20 Defendants. AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

22 23 Justin Salmen (“Plaintiff”), incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff claims that Defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.