Sandoval

Sandoval v. The Brigantine, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20203:20-cv-00189California1,109 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER SANDOVAL; ARLYN Case No.: 20-CV-189 JLS (MSB)

ANGULO; BRIAN MEDIGOVICH;

JASON CASILLAS; JOHNNY ORDER GRANTING JOINT

ESPINOZA; LUKE FRANCIS MOTIONS FOR (1) APPROVAL OF

JOHNSON; MISAEL ROSALEZ; SETTLEMENT OF INDIVIDUAL

SALVADOR VALADEZ; SILVIA STATUTORY CLAIMS AND PAGA

ALEGRIA; AND YOLANDA FLORES CLAIMS FOR CIVIL PENALTIES, LANDA; individually and on behalf of AND (2) DISMISSAL 16 similarly situated employees and aggrieved employees, (ECF Nos. 18, 19) Plaintiffs, v. THE BRIGANTINE, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1–25, inclusive, 21 Defendants.

Presently before the Court are the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement of Individual Statutory Claims and PAGA Claims for Civil Penalties (“Joint Mot. to Approve,” ECF No. 18) and Joint Motion for Dismissal (“Joint Mot. to Dismiss,” ECF No. 19). Having reviewed the Parties’ briefing and the law, the Court GRANTS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.