Garrison

Garrison v. Ringgold

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20203:19-cv-00244California4,979 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TOMMY GARRISON, an individual Case No.: 19-cv-0244 GPC-DEB CHRISTINE GARRISON, an individual,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION GRANTING v. IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 13 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR

REGINALD BUDDY RINGGOLD, III,

TERMINATING SANCTIONS aka Rasool Abdul Rahim El, an

Individual, ROSE GOLD INVESTMENTS, LLP, a Delaware [Dkt. No. 57.] 16 Partnership, and MASTER INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., a California Corporation, 18 Defendants.

20 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Tommy Garrison and Christine Garrison’s motion for 21 terminating sanctions against Defendants Reginald Buddy Ringgold, III, Rosegold 22 Investments, LLP and Master Investment Group, Inc., or in the alternative, motion for issue 23 preclusion sanctions. (Dkt. No. 57.) No opposition was filed. On September 11, 2020, 24 Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher1 filed a report and recommendation granting in part 25 and denying in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.