Dunsmore

Dunsmore v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20203:20-cv-01609California824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL DUNSMORE, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01609-LAB-WVG

Petitioner,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND (2)

GORE,

DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

Respondent. PREJUDICE 16 On August 17, 2020, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1.) On September 23, 2020, the Court dismissed this case without prejudice because Petitioner failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement. (ECF No. 3.) In the dismissal order, Petitioner was notified that in order to have this case reopened he had to either pay the filing fee or provide adequate proof of his inability to pay, no later than October 28, 2020. (See id. at 1.) REQUESTS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS On October 5, 2020, Petitioner filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3.) He filed a second application to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.