Youngevity International, Corp. v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20203:16-cv-00704California2,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Youngevity International, et al., Case No.: 3:16-cv-704-BTM-JLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

YOUNGEVITY’S MOTION FOR

Todd Smith, et al.,

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON

Defendants. COUNTERCLAIM SIX

16 [ECF NO. 667] Todd Smith, et al., Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. Youngevity International, et al., Counterclaim Defendants. 22 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ and Counterclaim Defendants’ (“Youngevity”) motion for summary judgment on Defendants’ and Counterclaim Plaintiffs’ (“Wakaya”) sixth counterclaim asserting tortious interference with existing economic relations. (ECF No. 667 (“Mot.”).) For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Youngevity’s motion. 28 BACKGROUND On February 12, 2016, Wakaya entered into a Royalty Agreement with Rick Anson (ECF No. 426-3, 6–14), and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.