Dunsmore

Dunsmore v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20203:20-cv-01378California2,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL DUNSMORE, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1378-JLS-AHG

Petitioner,

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

UNKNOWN,

REHEARING AND (2) CLARIFYING

Respondent. THIS COURT’S AUGUST 4, 2020

DISMISSAL ORDER

(ECF Nos. 3, 5) 18 On July 17, 2020, Petitioner Darryl Dunsmore, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. On August 4, 2020, this Court dismissed the Petition as successive pursuant to § 2244(b)(3)(A). (ECF No. 3.) In its dismissal Order, the Court noted that this was not the first Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus that Petitioner had submitted challenging his June 4, 2010 conviction in San Diego Superior Court Case No. SCS 215653. (Id.) Indeed, on May 17, 2013, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.