Diane Schroeder v. Stephen Hundley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20203:17-cv-00919California3,585 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIANE SCHROEDER, an individual, Case No.: 17-CV-919 JLS (LL)

AND EQUITY TRUST COMPANY

CUSTODIAN FBO DIANE ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART

SCHROEDER IRA, AND DENYING IN PART

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION,

Plaintiffs, (2) STRIKING DEFENDANTS’ v. ANSWERS, AND (3) DIRECTING

CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER

STEPHEN HUNDLEY; JASON

DEFAULT

CHAPPELL; AND DISTRESSED

ACQUISITIONS,

(ECF No. 53) 18 Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Diane Schroeder and Equity Trust Company Custodian fbo Diane Schroeder IRA’s Motion to Strike Answer and for Default and Default Judgment (“Mot.,” ECF No. 53), as well as Plaintiffs’ Response to Order Requesting Additional Briefing in Support of Motion (“Resp.,” ECF No. 59). Defendant Stephen Hundley filed an untimely Opposition to Default & Motion to Strike/Dismiss (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 65), to which Plaintiffs filed an opposition (“Reply,” ECF No. 66). The Court deems this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.