Buckelew

Buckelew v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20203:20-cv-00835California761 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DION SCOTT BUCKELEW, Case No. 20-cv-0835-BAS-AGS

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING AND

v. DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

SHERIFF WILLIAMS D. GORE, et al., CORPUS (ECF No. 1) Respondents.

16 17 On May 1, 2020, Petitioner Dion Scott Buckelew, proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Pet., ECF No. 1.) On May 19, 2020, the Court dismissed the Petition without prejudice and with leave to amend, finding that Petitioner had not paid the $5.00 filing fee nor moved to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and that the Petition did not state a cognizable claim for relief. (Order, ECF No. 2.) More than a month later, on June 24, 2020, Petitioner moved for leave to proceed IFP. (IFP Mot., ECF No. 3.) On July 8, 2020, the Court denied Petitioner’s request to proceed IFP, finding that Petitioner’s trust account statement showed he could afford the $5.00…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.