Moore
Moore v. Lankford
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 19CV2406-DMS (BLM) ROBERT MOORE,
Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING IN CAMERA
REVIEW
v. JOE LANKFORD, MERCEDES ARELLANO, R.
BUCKEL, AND DAVID STRUMSKI,
15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On August 16, 2020, Plaintiff submitted a motion to compel that was received on August 21, 2020 and accepted on discrepancy on September 4, 2020. ECF Nos. 25 and 27. Defendants opposed the motion on September 22, 2020. ECF No. 30. Plaintiff replied on September 29, 2020. ECF No. 31 On October 22, 2020, the Court issued an Order Denying In Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Compelling Discovery. ECF No. 32. In the order, the Court found that with respect to Interrogatory No. 16 to Defendant Lankford, No. 14 to Defendant Strumski, No. 15 to Defendant Arellano, and No. to Defendant Buckel, Defendants satisfied the threshold requirement for application of the Official Information Privilege. Id. at 11-12. The Court ordered Defendants to lodge with the Court a copy of the…