Prunty

Prunty v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20203:20-cv-00572California357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN PRUNTY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-572-MMA (AGS)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION

v. AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

ORDER

CAMP PENDLETON & QUANTICO

HOUSING LLC, and LPC PENDLETON [Doc. No. 34]

QUANTICO PM LP,

16 Defendants. 17 18 The parties have filed a joint stipulation and request for a dismissal order of the action with prejudice and with each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. See Doc. No. 34. Given the joint stipulation and its basis under Rule 41, this case has been DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety and the action has been terminated with each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. See Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]nce a notice of voluntary dismissal is filed, the district court in which the action is pending loses jurisdiction and cannot exercise discretion with respect to the terms and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.