Prunty
Prunty v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN PRUNTY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-572-MMA (AGS)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION
v. AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
ORDER
CAMP PENDLETON & QUANTICO
HOUSING LLC, and LPC PENDLETON [Doc. No. 34]
QUANTICO PM LP,
16 Defendants. 17 18 The parties have filed a joint stipulation and request for a dismissal order of the action with prejudice and with each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. See Doc. No. 34. Given the joint stipulation and its basis under Rule 41, this case has been DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety and the action has been terminated with each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. See Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]nce a notice of voluntary dismissal is filed, the district court in which the action is pending loses jurisdiction and cannot exercise discretion with respect to the terms and…