Bouche

Colorescience, Inc. v. Bouche

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20203:20-cv-00595California5,040 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLORESCIENCE, INC, Case No.: 20cv595-GPC(DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

STEPHEN BOUCHE, ERIC D.

NIELSON, and THE NIELSEN LAW

FIRM, P.C.,

[DKT. NO. 30.] 16 Defendants.

18 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 30.) 19 Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendants filed a reply. (Dkt. Nos. 60, 61.) Based on 20 the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 21 Procedural Background 22 On March 30, 2020, Plaintiff Colorescience, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Colorescience”), 23 as Plan Administrator of the Colorescience Welfare Benefit Plan (“the Plan”), filed a 24 complaint seeking to enforce its subrogation lien, a constructive trust and injunctive relief 25 pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 26 1132(a)(3), (Dkt. No. 1, Compl.), as well as a motion for temporary restraining order 27 (“TRO”) “enjoining [Defendants]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.