Wilson

Wilson v. Segovia

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20203:19-cv-02254California573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUCIOUS WILSON, Case No.: 19cv2254-TWR-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

SGT. SEGOVIA, et al.,

Defendants. 15 [ECF No. 44] 16 On November 9, 2020, nunc pro tunc, Lucious Wilson (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s October 13, 2020 Order denying Plaintiff’s Pitchess motion. (ECF No. 44). In the October 13, 2020 Order, the Court denied Plaintiff’s request for disclosure of “all incidents of excessive force or any other acts of violence” in Defendants’ personnel files as untimely. (ECF No. 35 at 2). As explained in the Order, a Pitchess motion is not binding on this Court and Plaintiff should have propounded discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a) to obtain Defendants’ personnel files. (Id. at 3). Even assuming Plaintiff did properly propound discovery, the Court found Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.