Carroll

Carroll v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20203:20-cv-01651California2,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREMAYNE CARROLL, Case No.: 20-CV-1651 JLS (MDD

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING

v. PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

RALPH DIAZ; COVELLO; et al.,

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Respondents. (ECF No. 9)

Presently before the Court is Petitioner Tremayne Carroll’s Objection to Court’s Order/Ruling (Dismissal), Petition for Reconsideration and Appointment of Counsel (“Mot.,” ECF No. 9), which the Court has construed as a motion for: (1) reconsideration of both the Court’s September 8, 2020 Order denying Petitioner’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application (the “First Order,” ECF No. 4) and the Court’s September 14, 2020 Order dismissing Petitioner’s First Amended Petition (“FAP,” ECF No. 5) without prejudice and without further leave to amend (the “Second Order,” ECF No. 6); and (2) appointment of counsel. Having carefully considered the underlying Orders, Petitioner’s arguments,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.