Carroll
Carroll v. Diaz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREMAYNE CARROLL, Case No.: 20-CV-1651 JLS (MDD
Petitioner,
ORDER DENYING
v. PETITIONER’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION AND
RALPH DIAZ; COVELLO; et al.,
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
Respondents. (ECF No. 9)
Presently before the Court is Petitioner Tremayne Carroll’s Objection to Court’s Order/Ruling (Dismissal), Petition for Reconsideration and Appointment of Counsel (“Mot.,” ECF No. 9), which the Court has construed as a motion for: (1) reconsideration of both the Court’s September 8, 2020 Order denying Petitioner’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application (the “First Order,” ECF No. 4) and the Court’s September 14, 2020 Order dismissing Petitioner’s First Amended Petition (“FAP,” ECF No. 5) without prejudice and without further leave to amend (the “Second Order,” ECF No. 6); and (2) appointment of counsel. Having carefully considered the underlying Orders, Petitioner’s arguments,…