Horton

Horton v. National Commercial Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20203:20-cv-00863California626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RACHEL HORTON, Case No.: 3:20-cv-863-W-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO CONTINUE

DEADLINES TO RAISE

NATIONAL COMMERCIAL

DISCOVERY DISPUTES WITH THE

SERVICES (doing business as NCS COURT Legal Services) and EXPERIAN

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., [ECF No. 25] Defendant.

24 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to continue the deadlines to raise 25 discovery disputes with the Court. ECF No. 25. Under the Court’s 45-Day Rule (see 26 Chmb.R. at 2–3), the parties would have been required to bring any discovery dispute 27 28 regarding Defendant Experian’s responses and Plaintiff’s responses to the Court’s attention by December 4 and December 11, respectively. ECF Nos. 25 at 2–3. The parties seek an order from the Court extending these deadlines by approximately one month. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.