Lessin

Lessin v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20203:19-cv-01082California9,244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM LESSIN, TAMER KAHLIL, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01082-AJB-AHG

MARK PREISS, JULIE SNODGRASS,

JOHN FARLEKAS, WILLIAM ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

VINSON, JOYCE JENSEN, DAVID DENYING IN PART FORD MOTOR MORRIS, and SCOTT BITTNER, on COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS 14 behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, (Doc. No. 17) Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware 18 corporation; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant. 20 Presently before the Court is Defendant Ford Motor Company’s (“Ford”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) or in the alternative to strike nationwide class allegations. (Doc. No. 17.) Plaintiffs opposed the motion, (Doc. No. 21), and Ford replied, (Doc. No. 23.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Ford’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs William Lessin, Mark Preiss, Julie Snodgrass, John Farlekas, William Vinson, Joyce Jensen,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.