Droz

Droz v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20203:19-cv-01277California1,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLAKE DROZ, Case No.: 19-CV-1277-W-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO

v. CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND

OTHER PRE-TRIAL

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; RICHARD

PROCEEDINGS

FISCHER; and DOES 1 through 10, 15 inclusive, 16 Defendants.

18 On November 6, 2020, the Parties filed a Joint Motion to Continue Discovery and 19 Other Pre-Trial Proceedings (“Joint Motion”). (Doc. No. 25.) The Parties request a three- 20 month continuance of the December 11, 2020 fact discovery cut-off and all other dates 21 thereafter, as set forth in the operative July 22, 2020 Scheduling Order Regulating 22 Discovery and Other Pre-Trial Proceedings (“Scheduling Order”). (Doc. No. 24.) The 23 Parties represent “Defendants have diligently pursued discovery but numerous items are 24 still outstanding.” (Doc. No. 25, 1:10-11.) From there, the Parties explain that a three- 25 month continuance of the relevant dates in the Scheduling Order is necessary due to the 26 inadequacy of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.