Arnhart

Cre8tive Technology and Design v. Arnhart

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20203:19-cv-01814California1,649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRE8TIVE TECHNOLOGY AND Case No.: 19cv1814-AJG-AHG

DESIGN,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT Plaintiff, MOTION TO AMEND

SCHEDULING ORDER

v. REGULATING DISCOVERY

MARY ARNHART, AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL

PROCEEDINGS

Defendant. 16 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. [ECF No. 48] 18 By joint motion, the parties request that the Court amend the schedule in this case, which was set in the original scheduling order (ECF No. 24) and amended twice since then (ECF Nos. 42, 47). The parties explain that they held off on completing some discovery in an effort to save costs before participating in a mediation session with the Honorable Leo Papas. ECF No. at 2. Though the parties mediated for fourteen hours on November 4, 2020, they were unable to resolve the dispute. Id. However, because the parties continue to work towards settling the case, and because Defendant is expected to undergo surgery requiring a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.