Raiser

Raiser v. Casserly

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20203:18-cv-01836California1,126 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 18-CV-1836 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. (1) MOTION FOR PACER ACCESS

AND (2) MOTION FOR

HON. TIMOTHY CASSERLY, et al.,

RECONSIDERATION

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 79, 80) 16 17 Presently before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Aaron Raiser’s Ex Parte Application for PACER Access at Regular Cost or for Paper Copies of Docket IFP (“Mot.,” ECF No. 80) and Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Reconsider Application for PACER Access IFP (“Mot. Recons.,” ECF No. 79). After considering the facts and the law, the Court rules as follows. MOTION FOR PACER ACCESS Plaintiff requests that the Court waive Plaintiff’s unpaid past usage fees of $750 on the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (“PACER”) system so his account will be reactivated. See Mot. at 1. The applicable fees PACER charges users are set forth in a 27 28 schedule issued by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.