Raiser

Raiser v. The United States District Court for the Southern District of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20203:20-cv-01490California580 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 20-CV-1490 TWR (AGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) ACCEPTING FILING

v. FEE AS TIMELY, AND (2) DENYING WITHOUT THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

PREJUDICE WAIVER OF PACER

COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN

FEES DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

16 Defendants. (ECF No. 12)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Aaron Raiser’s Ex Parte Application for Order Allowing (1) Filing Fee Paid Nunc Pro Tunc, and (2) PACER Access IFP (“Ex Parte App.,” ECF No. 12), which was accepted on discrepancy. (See ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff explains that he timely paid his filing fee by October 26, 2020, but that it was mistakenly returned. (See Ex Parte App. at 2; see also Ex. 1.) The Court therefore GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application and DEEMS Plaintiff’s filing fee timely pursuant to the Honorable Dana M. Sabraw’s September 11, 2020 Order. (See ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff also “asks for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.