Romero

Romero v. Securus Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20203:16-cv-01283California6,888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN ROMERO, FRANK TISCARENO, Case No.: 16cv1283 JM (MDD) and KENNETH ELLIOTT on behalf of 12 themselves and all others similarly situated, ORDER ON MOTION FOR FINAL

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION

Plaintiffs,

SETTLEMENT AND ORDER ON

v. MOTION FOR COSTS, INCENTIVE

AWARDS, AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES

SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. 18 Plaintiffs Juan Romero, Kenneth Elliott, and Frank Tiscareno (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the class they represent, move for final approval of a class action settlement reached with Defendant Securus Technologies, Inc. (“Securus”). (Doc. No. 179.) Plaintiffs also move for litigation costs, incentive awards, and attorneys’ fees. (Doc. No. 181.) Neither motion is opposed. A final approval hearing on the motions was held on November 9, 2020, with counsel for Plaintiffs and Securus appearing telephonically. No class members appeared. For …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.