Hyde-Edwards Salon & Spa v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20203:20-cv-00762California1,809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HYDE-EDWARDS SALON & SPA, Case No.: 20cv762 DMS(MDD) Individually and on Behalf of All Others 12 Similarly Situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO Plaintiffs,

COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO

14 v. STAY THE ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION JP MORGAN CHASE & CO and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendants. 18

20 This case comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and to stay the action pending arbitration. Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendants filed a reply. For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Hyde-Edwards Salon and Spa is a customer of Defendants JP Morgan Chase & Co. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Compl. ¶39.) On approximately March 28 17, 2020, Plaintiff’s business closed in accordance with San Diego County’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.