Delisle
Delisle v. Speedy Cash
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY DELISLE and ROBERT Case No.: 3:18-cv-02042-GPC-RBB DOUGHERTY, individually and on 12 behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND Plaintiffs,
STAY PROCEEDINGS UPON
14 v. REMAND
SPEEDY CASH,
[ECF Nos. 18, 62, 63] 16 Defendant.
On July 24, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (“Ninth Circuit”) vacated the Court’s Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (“Order”), ECF No. 23, and remanded for the limited purpose of considering what effect, if any, California Financial Code Section 22304.5(a) has on the Court’s public injunctive relief analysis. ECF No. 62. Parties filed supplemental briefs, along with an evidentiary objection and response. ECF Nos. 63, 65–68. A hearing was held on the matter on October 16, 2020. ECF No. 73. Having considered all related documents and the applicable law, the Court once again…