Thomas

Thomas v. Spencer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20203:18-cv-01601California2,506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8

RUDIE THOMAS,

Case No.: 18-cv-1601-AJB-MSB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. GREGORY J. SLAVONIC, Acting (Doc. No. 87) Secretary of the Navy et al., Defendants. 14 15 Defendant, Acting Secretary of the Navy1 (“Secretary”), moves to dismiss Plaintiff Rudie Thomas’s (“Thomas”) first amended complaint (“FAC”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to state a claim, insufficient service of process, and failure to comply with the requirements to make a “short and plain statement” under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 87.) For the reasons set forth, the Court GRANTS the Secretary’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND2 According to Thomas, during his employment as a Supply Technician at the Naval Medical Center in San Diego, California, from January 23, 2008 to November 27, 2017, he was a victim of discrimination, harassment, intimidation, retaliation, hostile …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.